Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Ask Doctor Differ
Dear Esteemed Doctor Differ,
We are worried. We have worked hard for decades to build a club of power and tradition, and now that is threatened. More and more, "the powers that be" are forcing us to let new money into our precious club. We, in places like Ann Arbor, South Bend and Tuscaloosa have fought against the tyranny of parity. Yet, these Lilliputian losers are intent on ruining a good thing.
We have graciously allowed these less fortunate ones to park our cars, wash our dishes, check our coats, and look us in the eyes, only to be spit in the face. How can we be respected if we let these pip-squeek upstarts into our club? Many (we'll just call the worst offenders, the Mormons, the Red Mormons, the Blue Turfs, the Horny Frogs, the Castro Street Warriors and Fresno State) knock our doors at all hours of the day, expecting us to answer.
To further display our graceful nature, we have recently gone against tradition and allowed some of them into our soirees, if they met some reasonable demands. This only led to calls for our club to be torn down. Never! This just goes to show you that if you give a dog a bone, he will hump our leg until you give him another. What can we do to get them away from our club? Build and electric fence? Ignore them? Please Dr. Differ, help us.
Traditionally yours,
The Bastions of College Football
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Bastards,
This reminds the Dr. of the time his beloved English Bulldog, Sir Thomas More, peed on his Ottoman. (This was not a footstool but a life-size statue of a medieval Turkish conqueror.) To punish this urination, the Dr. used the only civilized form of canine punishment, humiliation. The doc dressed Sir Tom in a tutu and a Clippers jersey and paraded him up and down the aisles of the local Pets-R-Smart store. Tail between his legs, he learned his lesson.
The only way to stop these upstarts from peeing all over your tradition is through humiliation. However, you have a conundrum. You can't simply grab the intruders by their hind legs and slide a frilly tutu over their hips; you must convince them to do it themselves. You will have to allow a few of them into your club for a few hours, but trust the Dr., it will be worth it. And best of all, they will think that is was worth it for them also.
These upstarts need to think ridiculous acts must be performed for entrance into exclusivity. Even though the most ridiculous thing any of you did to get into the club was being born to parents named Thurston and Kitty, it is crucial the outsiders believe that the ridiculousness is necessary.
Invite a handful of wanna-be members to the "presentation ceremony" on your front lawn (that way they feel good about getting through the front gates, but they can't actually stink up the clubhouse). Let them know that only one membership is available, so they must compete for it. Concoct with your cronies a few "events," making sure that there will be a lot of spectators for the outsiders' humiliation. These events could include naked freeway unicycle races, trekkie fashion shows at a renaissance faire, being seen at a Raiders game; really whatever your twisted minds can invent. Just remember to have fun.
You will have to choose a winner and allow him to come to a party at the clubhouse, but if you look at the big picture, that one night will be worth it. Besides, he'll probably get smashed and end up head first in the courtyard fountain anyway.
Advisingly,
Doctor Differ
(Questions for Doctor Differ can be sent to doctordiffer@gmail.com. If it is good enough, he may respond on this blog.)
Monday, October 13, 2008
Beg the New Fast Automatic F-REEK (or, how to waste two hours at work)

(Like most of the Beg the Differs, this does not approach a debate. In fact, we are not really sure what to call it. This is only barely sports-related. Still, you'll be happy to know that we avoided all of our Frequently Despised Sports Terms. The deep question invoked in this tome is "What is my Wu-Tang name?")
me: My Wu Tang name is Bilious Bad Janitah.
I think I'll keep that one to myself.
Top-Heavy Hookjaw.
But, change Johnson to Ocho Cinco and he's Alarmingly-Named Wolfman.
Friday, September 5, 2008
Beg the Differ: The Great Hair Products Debate

Corban: Zach just called me a jerl. Do you know what a jerl is?
me: A guy who drinks way too much jheri curl.
Corban: Is there an amount of jheri curl that wouldn't be too much to drink?
I would think that you can't drink any amount of jheri curl and be ok.
me: I guess you're right.
Little known fact, Walter Payton had his blood replaced by Jheri Curl in the mid-1970's.
Corban: Is that what made him "Sweetness?"
me: Yes, Jheri Curl introduced high fructose corn syrup.
Corban: So you're saying that the jheri curl industry is really in the pocket of the corn lobby?
me: Try the other way around.
Corban: Ahhh...I smell a very sugary Oliver Stone conspiracy movie in the works.
me: It's called Jheri Crack Corn.
Corban: I like it.
I see Wesley Snipes as the creator of jheri curl who gets caught up in the high stakes world of specialty beauty products.
I hope he's available.
me: He's is, but he needs to be paid under the table.
In cash.
Is it ironic that the maker of Jheri Curl now primarily sells a chemical hair straightener?
Corban: Not really. Wouldn't they just have to reverse the formula?
me: But that would render it undrinkable.
Corban: Not necessarily. You'd be surprised what you can drink.
me: See, I guess that's where we differ. I never let that word, can, hold me down.
Corban: Maybe you should let that word hold you back a little.
me: Does fantasy football make you more or less interested in regular NFL games?
Corban: Far more interested. Before I would watch Broncos games (Go Broncos) and pretty much ignore the rest of the league. Now I find myself monitoring pretty much every game because I've got players involved or my opponent for the week does.
me: Before fantasy football, I only cared about football teams (mainly loving the Bears and hating the Raiders and the Vikings and the Packers). Now, except for the Bears, I only care about individual players. Overall, my interest in the league is higher now, but I generally couldn't care less who wins what.
me: How many references to The Hills in a sports column does it take before you lose all credibility as a writer?
I like Simmons as much as the next guy, but we need to have an intervention.
Corban: What's the Hills?
me: A crappy MTV reality show about self-absorbed, vacuous California teens.
Corban: Is that the one that seems like it's actually scripted?
me: I don't know, I don't watch it. But it wouldn't surprise me. I don't think that any of those kids can actually speak coherently by themselves.
Corban: I think that most reality show are basically crap. I do like some of the competition shows however. Wipeout is awesome.
Corban: Sorry I've been quiet. I took the Browns to the Super Bowl.
me: Well, wouldn't Art Modell be proud.
Corban: I think he lost all straight males when he wrote an entire paragraph about characters from the Hills.
me: Yeah, you're probably right.
I understand having a guilty pleasure. But it should remain hidden. You don't want anybody outside of yourself who knows that you like The Hills or 90210, whether you're male or female.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Beg the Differ Shorts

These are stunted debates and conversations between yours truly and the Corbster. The reasons for not finishing vary from Gmail outages to brain outages, but regardless we will post them. Why? Because we can.
"I've tried to find it here in the states, but they just can't get the spices right"-
Corban:| 5 minutes |
Robots are Dangerous-
me: In case you wanted to know, www.thediffer.com now also redirects to the blog. So, at least things are now simpler.
| 42 minutes |
Corban: The Jazz just matched OKC's offer for Miles
| 5 minutes |
Brett Favre is not a Horse-
| 25 minutes |
Your Girlfriend is A Lesbian-
me: Sorry, I just realized I missed a call from you last night. I left my phone in the car.
| 10 minutes |
Pantheon of Sport: Falling with Style

It's time to examine another Olympic event for inclusion in the Pantheon of Sport: diving. Let's begin with the athleticism required for diving. Just looking at the sculpted physiques of Olympic divers is evidence of their strength. Who doesn't love women in bathing suits and/or memn in Speedos? They have balance and body control in heaps. So far, so good. Diving is looking like a strong candidate for membership in the upper reaches of the Pantheon.
Alas, there is one criterion that diving falls (pun intended) short in: scoring. Scoring is completely subjective, sometimes embarrassingly so. I decided to do some research before making my arguments about diving and caught some of the synchronized (giggling) diving competition. One American pair completed what seemed to be a perfectly synchronized (giggling) dive. The dive was graceful and artistic. One would assume that a panel of experts would all rate the dive in small range of scores. One would be mistaken. Scores for this particular dive ranged from 7.5 to 9.5. I openly confess to my ignorance of judging dives but when there is a discrepency that large from judges who are experts it makes you wonder what the thought process is. "That was a pretty good dive but it looks like his Speedo is creeping a little bit. I think that I'll deduct half a point."
So, diving will not be included in the Pantheon of Sport but is classified from here on out and for all eternity (or until we change our minds, whichever comes first) as a (very) Athletic Performance.
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Beg The Differ: Ethnic Cleansing Edition

Ed Note: First off, I apologize for needing to excuse our poor debating "skills." This is not a debate. This is a conversation between two people who should be more medicated. So, if you know a good mental health specialist, who treats schizophrenia, please pass along his or her information. Thank you and be careful.
Corban: Do we have enough players tonight?
| 12 minutes |
| 5 minutes |
Monday, August 4, 2008
Pantheon of Sport: Organized Limb Flailing
Ed note: The principal arguments of the Pantheon are not personal attacks on the competitors. These articles are really just an argument over semantics. We feel that the term “sport” has been bastardized and we hope to help refine it.
This is the first in what should be a multi-part series dissecting various Olympic events’ claims for inclusion in the Pantheon of Sport. We’ll start off with perhaps the easiest, synchronized swimming.
For the first few years of its existence, synchronized swimming was known as “water ballet.” While Baryshnikov is a prime specimen of power, grace, and agility, one would strain to define ballet as sport, right? If you were to put a ball in his hands I suspect that he would look a lot like that kid in junior high gym class who spent more time facing his computer screen than a backboard. (I know what that looks like because there exists evidence of my attempts at basketball.) So, how is it that a submerged artistic performance ever became known as a sport?
Okay, here’s a quick aside. It appears to be a stretch to think that many people, if anyone, actually considers synchronized swimming to be a sport. In fact, the IOC website only refers to the event as a sport once.
First, according to the rules set forth in the intro Pantheon article, “Scoring cannot be subjective.” Subjective scoring is the only form of scoring existent in this event. The judges not only award points based on difficulty of maneuvers or on the synchronicity of teammates, they also indirectly take into account costume and makeup. So, the more creative the costume (not uniform, costume) the more favorably the judges will score. When would that happen in any legitimate sport?
Second, the name doesn’t completely fit the performance. How can there be solo synchronized swimming? Is the performer synchronized with the voices in her head? It could be said that she is synchronized with the music, but that is hard to prove. So, not only do I propose this event’s exclusion from the Pantheon of Sport, I also propose a name change: Organized Limb Flailing.
Finally, when was dancing in unison considered a sport? If it were Iron Maiden would be considered legends in the sport.
I would go on about Organized Limb Flailing’s exclusion from the Pantheon, but I’m getting bored with this event. So the verdict is: Synchronized Swimming is NOT a sport. Take us out Sting:Thursday, July 31, 2008
Pantheon of Sport
We, here at the Differ (Differers, if you will), have noticed a disturbing trend of certain events being labeled sports, when clearly they are not. We don’t need to list these events in this posting, but we do propose an ever-evolving list of rules that would disqualify an event from being shown on ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNEWS, Fox Sports Net, the Big 12 Network or the MTN (mad props to the half a dozen people who know what the MTN is).In the future we will examine sports individually to determine it’s worthiness to be entered or excluded from the Pantheon of Sporthood. Calling all events of a competitive nature a sport cheapen both real sports and the non-sports by not recognizing the uniqueness and/or artistry of their events. Shouldn’t we allow for separate classifications that gives different status (possibly elevated status).
It should be noted that we reserve the right to change, edit, and reformulate these rules based on new facts, reasoned argument, and our own personal whims and biases. The first rules are as follows:
1. Sports are inherently athletic pursuits. Coordination should not be mistaken for athleticism. If an event can not elevate one’s heart rate due to physical exertion (such as running) it cannot be considered a sport. This physical exertion does not need to be for extended periods but it must be present.
2. Scoring cannot be subjective. If an event requires a panel of experts or judges to determine scoring and it’s possible for these experts to see the exact same maneuver and score it differently then that event is not a sport.
3. As I have stated before, sports must be athletic. Your equipment should not be more important than the participant. While certain events may be physically demanding, if the equipment is doing most of the work and the equipment’s failure does not allow you to continue then that event is not a sport.
4. A sport should not be able to be played while smoking and/or drinking a beer.

If you search the internet for "Sport or Not" you will certainly find a number of blogs and websites that tackle this very issue. So what makes our take on the subject matter different? First, we will not make non-points like "sports are not (deleted expletive) stupid." Our arguments may not be completely original or even 100% objective but I can guarantee you won't hear one of them on an elementary school playground. Second, we allow for argument and reserve the right to re-evaluate a position if new evidence or a new argument warrant it. If you don't agree with a something we have said, say so. We would love for you make comments.
Batting lead off for examination are Olympic events. Check out the Differ beginning next week when we get a little damp and evaluate aquatic events including diving and synchronized swimming.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Frequently Despised Sports Terms (FDST)
athleticism (adj)- Ambiguously describes a player's quickness, leaping ability or endurance. (Chris Henry's athleticism enabled him to leap three backyard fences in the same time it took the cops to get over one.) Suggested alternatives: none, it simply needs to be eradicated from the vocabulary of all commentators. By definition all athletes have some level of athleticism.
double-double (n)-When a basketball player records double digits in two statistical categories. (Boozer earned a double-double in rebounds and blown defensive assignments last night.) Note: This one probably is only repulsive to anyone who has to listen to local Utah Jazz broadcasts. Let’s put it this way, if there were a drinking game that involved Craig Bolerjack and Ron Boone saying “double-double,” prohibition would no longer be an antiquated idea.
length (adj)- Typically refers to the reach of a basketball player. (Dick Vitale's bruised face learned of Josh Smith’s length first hand.) Suggested alternatives: so-and-so has long arms, etc.
props (n)- Proper recognition; often used with the adjective mad. (I give mad props to the people at Hooters for simultaneously ruining hot wings and breasts.) Suggested alternatives: good job, recognize, etc.
Spygate (n)-That thing where the New England Patriots were caught recording an opposing team’s signals. (Man, I’m sick of all this Spygate crap.) Suggested alternatives: deporting whoever first used the damn term.
upside (adj)- Referring to an undeveloped prospect’s potential abilities. (Unfortunately ESPN’s draft analysis shows have unrealized upside.) Suggested alternatives: so-and-so could be really good, etc.
walk-off (adj)-Game winning last play. (He laid down a walk-off royal flush to win the pot.) Suggested alternatives: game-winning, ____ that won the game.
